Article Text
Research Article
Managed care and ethical conflicts: anything new?
Abstract
Does managed care represent the death knell for the ethical provision of medical care? Much of the current literature suggests as much. In this essay I argue that the types of ethical conflicts brought on by managed care are, in fact, similar to those long faced by physicians and by other professionals. Managed care presents new, but not fundamentally different, factors to be considered in medical decision making. I also suggest ways of better understanding and resolving these conflicts, in part by distinguishing among conflicts of interest, of bias and of obligation.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical quandaries posing as conflicts of interest
- Should physicians be gatekeepers of medical resources?
- Conflicts of interest in clinical ethics consults
- Ethics and Technology Transfer
- Ethical issues raised by the introduction of payment for performance in France
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
- Survey on the function, structure and operation of hospital ethics committees in Shanghai
- The physician charter on medical professionalism: a Jewish ethical perspective
- Gaps, conflicts, and consensus in the ethics statements of professional associations, medical groups, and health plans