Article Text
Abstract
Immunisation is offered to all age groups in the UK, but is mainly given to infants and school-age children. Such immunisation is not compulsory, in contrast to other countries, such as the United States. Levels of immunisation are generally very high in the UK, but the rates of immunisation vary with the public perception of the risk of side effects. This article discusses whether compulsory vaccination is acceptable by considering individual cases where parents have failed to give consent or have explicitly refused consent for their children to be immunised. In particular, the rights of: a parent to rear his/her child according to his/her own standards; the child to receive health care, and the community to be protected from vaccine-preventable infectious disease are considered. The conclusion of the article is that compulsory vaccination cannot, with very few exceptions, be justified in the UK, in view of the high levels of population immunity which currently exist.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Herd immunity, vaccination and moral obligation
- Assessing herd immunity against rubella in Japan: a retrospective seroepidemiological analysis of age-dependent transmission dynamics
- From compulsory to voluntary immunisation: Italy’s National Vaccination Plan (2005–7) and the ethical and organisational challenges facing public health policy-makers across Europe
- Considerations for vaccinating children against COVID-19
- Childhood immunisation: what is the future?
- BCG vaccination in England since 2005: a survey of policy and practice
- Vaccine disputes
- How to hold an ethical pox party
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- Case for persuasion in parental informed consent to promote rational vaccine choices