The four principles approach to biomedical ethics (4PBE) has, since the 1970s, been increasingly developed as a universal bioethics method. Despite its wide acceptance and popularity, the 4PBE has received many challenges to its cross-cultural plausibility. This paper first specifies the principles and characteristics of ancient Chinese medical ethics (ACME), then makes a comparison between ACME and the 4PBE with a view to testing out the 4PBE's cross-cultural plausibility when applied to one particular but very extensive and prominent cultural context. The result shows that the concepts of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice are clearly identifiable in ACME. Yet, being influenced by certain socio-cultural factors, those applying the 4PBE in Chinese society may tend to adopt a "beneficence-oriented", rather than an "autonomy-oriented" approach, which, in general, is dissimilar to the practice of contemporary Western bioethics, where "autonomy often triumphs".
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Developing a culturally relevant bioethics for Asian people
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- After 20 years, some reflections and farewell!
- Ethics of sedation for existential suffering: palliative medicine physician perceptions - qualitative study
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics