Article Text
Abstract
The four principles approach to biomedical ethics (4PBE) has, since the 1970s, been increasingly developed as a universal bioethics method. Despite its wide acceptance and popularity, the 4PBE has received many challenges to its cross-cultural plausibility. This paper first specifies the principles and characteristics of ancient Chinese medical ethics (ACME), then makes a comparison between ACME and the 4PBE with a view to testing out the 4PBE's cross-cultural plausibility when applied to one particular but very extensive and prominent cultural context. The result shows that the concepts of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice are clearly identifiable in ACME. Yet, being influenced by certain socio-cultural factors, those applying the 4PBE in Chinese society may tend to adopt a "beneficence-oriented", rather than an "autonomy-oriented" approach, which, in general, is dissimilar to the practice of contemporary Western bioethics, where "autonomy often triumphs".
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Developing a culturally relevant bioethics for Asian people
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- After 20 years, some reflections and farewell!
- Ethics of sedation for existential suffering: palliative medicine physician perceptions - qualitative study
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics