Article Text
Abstract
One potentially valuable use of cloning is to provide a source of tissues or organs for transplantation. The most important objection to this use of cloning is that a human clone would be the sort of entity that it would be seriously wrong to kill. I argue that entities of the sort that you and I essentially are do not begin to exist until around the seventh month of fetal gestation. Therefore to kill a clone prior to that would not be to kill someone like you or me but would be only to prevent one of us from existing. And even after one of us begins to exist, the objections to killing it remain comparatively weak until its psychological capacities reach a certain level of maturation. These claims support the permissibility of killing a clone during the early stages of its development in order to use its organs for transplantation.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
- Ethical and legal aspects of stem cell practices in Turkey: where are we?
- Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Western Regional Meeting Abstracts