Article Text
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PID) is often seen as an improvement upon prenatal testing. I argue that PID may exacerbate the eugenic features of prenatal testing and make possible an expanded form of free-market eugenics. The current practice of prenatal testing is eugenic in that its aim is to reduce the numbers of people with genetic disorders. Due to social pressures and eugenic attitudes held by clinical geneticists in most countries, it results in eugenic outcomes even though no state coercion is involved. I argue that technological advances may soon make PID widely accessible. Because abortion is not involved, and multiple embryos are available, PID is radically more effective as a tool of genetic selection. It will also make possible selection on the basis of non-pathological characteristics, leading, potentially, to a full-blown free-market eugenics. For these reasons, I argue that PID should be strictly regulated.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis: contemporary practices in light of the past
- Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a step by step guide to recent Italian ethical and legislative troubles
- An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
- Genetic testing and reproductive choice in neurological disorders
- Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines