Article Text
Research Article
The social nature of disability, disease and genetics: a response to Gillam, Persson, Holtug, Draper and Chadwick.
Abstract
The dominance of the biomedically informed view of disability, genetics, and diagnosis is explored. An understanding of the social nature of disability and genetics, especially in terms of oppression, adds a richer dimension to an understanding of ethical issues pertaining to genetics. This is much wider than the limited question of whether or not such technology discriminates. Instead, it is proposed that such technology will perpetuate the oppression and control of people with disability, especially if the knowledge of people with disability is not utilised in bioethical debates.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Research Article
- Research Article
- Research Article
- Research Article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Science fiction in bioethics: a role for feminist narratology
- The Ableist stare: an interdisciplinary, narrative-driven exploration of staring at disabled bodies
- Human-centred design, disability and bioethics
- ‘Nothing About Us Without Us’: exploring benefits and challenges of peer support for people with disability in peer support organisations – protocol paper for a qualitative coproduction project
- Disability and narrative: new directions for medicine and the medical humanities
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Moving through capacity space: mapping disability and enhancement
- Science fiction authors’ perspectives on human genetic engineering
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Disability and philosophy: applying ethics in circumstances of injustice