Article info
PDFResearch Article
Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?
Citation
Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?
Publication history
- First published April 1, 1999.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- New European guidelines for the use of stored human biological materials in biomedical research
- The right not to know: an autonomy based approach
- Consent for anaesthesia
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- “I can put the medicine in his soup, Doctor!”
- Privacy, autonomy and direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a response to Vayena
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- “Not safe” is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product
- How shared is shared decision-making? A care-ethical view on the role of partner and family