Article Text
Abstract
Many new reproductive methods such as artificial insemination, in vitro fertilisation, freezing of human embryos, and surrogate motherhood were at first widely condemned but are now seen in Western society as not just ethically and morally acceptable, but beneficial in that they allow otherwise infertile couples to have children. The idea of human cloning was also quickly condemned but debate is now emerging. This article examines cloning from a Jewish perspective and finds evidence to support the view that there is nothing inherently wrong with the idea of human cloning. A hypothesis is also advanced suggesting that even if a body was cloned, the brain, which is the essence of humanity, would remain unique. This author suggests that the debate should be changed from "Is cloning wrong?" to "When is cloning wrong?".
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access issues
- Ethical and legal aspects of stem cell practices in Turkey: where are we?
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- In vitro eugenics
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
- Is cell science dangerous?