Article info
PDFResearch Article
Do studies of the nature of cases mislead about the reality of cases? A response to Pattison et al.
Citation
Do studies of the nature of cases mislead about the reality of cases? A response to Pattison et al.
Publication history
- First published February 1, 1999.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Representing young men’s experience of anorexia nervosa: a French-language case study
- Out of date: genetics, history and the British novel of the 1990s
- Reading heredity in racist environments: epigenetic imaginaries in Bessie Head’s The Cardinals
- Fiction-reading for good or ill: eating disorders, interpretation and the case for creative bibliotherapy research
- Critical medical humanities: embracing entanglement, taking risks
- Talking around embodiment: the views of GPs following participation in medical anthropology courses
- Ferments and the AIDS virus: interspecies counter-conduct in the history of AIDS
- The ‘I’ of the beholder: studying the ‘self’ across the humanities and neuroscience
- New poetics of postcolonial relations: global genetic kinship in Zadie Smith’s White Teeth and Amitav Ghosh’s The Calcutta Chromosome
- ‘Creative Ferment’: abortion and reproductive agency in Bessie Head’s Personal Choices trilogy