The commodification of human reproductive materials.
This essay develops a framework for thinking about the moral basis for the commodification of human reproductive materials. It argues that selling and buying gametes and genes is morally acceptable although there should not be a market for zygotes, embryos, or genomes. Also a market in gametes and genes should be regulated in order to address concerns about the adverse social consequences of commodification.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: reproductive freedom and genetic kinship
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- In vitro eugenics
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come
- Paying for particulars in people-to-be: commercialisation, commodification and commensurability in human reproduction