In a recent article entitled, Requests "for inappropriate" treatment based on religious beliefs, Orr and Genesen claim that futile treatment should be provided to patients who request it if their request is based on a religious belief. I claim that this implies that we should also accede to requests for harmful or cost-ineffective treatments based on religious beliefs. This special treatment of religious requests is an example of special pleading on the part of theists and morally objectionable discrimination against atheists. It also provides an excellent illustration of how different the practices of religion and ethics are.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Cultural sensitivity in paediatrics
- Are my religious beliefs anyone’s business? A framework for declarations in health and biomedicine
- Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study
- Medically valid religious beliefs
- The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries