Article info
PDFCorrection
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?
Citation
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?
Online issue publication
December 01, 1998
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
- Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?
- Applying the four principles
- Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 2. A novel approach based on rational non-interventional paternalism.
- Why some Jehovah's Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society blood policy
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Festschrift edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics in honour of Raanan Gillon