Article info
PDFBook Review
Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things
Citation
Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things
Online issue publication
October 01, 1998
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The ‘fetus as a patient’ in maternal–fetal surgery
- Challenging the principle of proportionality
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- A qualified endorsement of embryonic stem cell research, based on two widely shared beliefs about the brain-diseased patients such research might benefit
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status