Article Text
Research Article
Pulling up the runaway: the effect of new evidence on euthanasia's slippery slope.
Abstract
The slippery slope argument has been the mainstay of many of those opposed to the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. In this paper I re-examine the slippery slope in the light of two recent studies that examined the prevalence of medical decisions concerning the end of life in the Netherlands and in Australia. I argue that these two studies have robbed the slippery slope of the source of its power--its intuitive obviousness. Finally I propose that, contrary to the warnings of the slippery slope, the available evidence suggests that the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide might actually decrease the prevalence of non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Research Article
Other content recommended for you
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, or withdrawal of treatment
- How is COVID-19 changing the ways doctors make end-of-life decisions?
- The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?