Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's rights.
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Applying the four principles
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Assessing the ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context
- Principlism and communitarianism
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?