Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's rights.
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient's rights.
Other content recommended for you
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Applying the four principles
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Assessing the ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context
- Principlism and communitarianism
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?