Do six million Jehovah's Witnesses mean what they say? Muramoto's not-so-subtle proposition is that they don't, because of a system of control akin to the Orwellian "thought police". My response is that the fast developing cooperative relationship between our worldwide community and the medical profession as a whole, and the proven record of that community's steadfast integrity in relation to their Christian principles is the evidence that we do! I seek to highlight the inaccuracy of information, which Muramoto admits came largely from dis-enchanted ex-members, by quoting "established" medical ethical opinion that refusal of blood transfusions must be respected as evidence of patient autonomy. Personal experience of my work on hospital liaison committees for Jehovah's Witnesses is reviewed and I endeavour to prove that our view of blood, and its association with life, goes to the very core of the human psyche. Lastly I suggest that faith transcends rationality. Human beings are more than just minds! Our deep moral sense and consciousness that our dignity is diminished by living our lives solely on the "self interest" principle, lies at the heart of true personal autonomy. Maybe it's a case of "two men looking through the same bars: one seeing mud, the other stars".
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Applying the four principles
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Assessing the ethical weight of cultural, religious and spiritual claims in the clinical context
- Principlism and communitarianism
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?