The new South African constitution commits the government to guarantee "basic health services" for every child under 18. Primary health care for pregnant women and children under six and elements of essential primary health care have received priority. At present, there is little analysis of the moral considerations involved in making choices about more advanced or costly health care which may, arguably, also be "basic". This paper illustrates some of the tensions in setting priorities for a just macro-allocation of children's health care, given the realities of need and scarce resources, and the commitment to equality of basic opportunities.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Challenges in the provision of ICU services to HIV infected children in resource poor settings: a South African case study
- Access to primary healthcare during lockdown measures for COVID-19 in rural South Africa: an interrupted time series analysis
- Strengthening primary healthcare in India: white paper on opportunities for partnership
- UK child survival in a European context: recommendations for a national Countdown Collaboration
- PACK Child: the development of a practical guide to extend the scope of integrated primary care for children and young adolescents
- Where are the paediatricians? An international survey to understand the global paediatric workforce
- Integrated care: a solution for improving children's health?
- Towards universal health coverage: lessons from 10 years of healthcare reform in China
- The impact of community-based outreach immunisation services on immunisation coverage with GIS network accessibility analysis in peri-urban areas, Zambia
- Strengthening public health services to achieve universal health coverage in China