A reply to McLachlan.
In an earlier article in this journal, I advanced five ethical arguments in favour of a voluntary, unpaid system of blood donation. In his reply to my article, Hugh McLachlan criticised one of those arguments, namely, the argument that an unpaid system promotes altruism and social solidarity. In this reply to Dr. McLachlan, I maintain that his criticism is misguided, and that he appears unclear not only about my own argument, but also about his own.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of sedation for existential suffering: palliative medicine physician perceptions - qualitative study
- Demanding pure motives for donation: the moral acceptability of blood donations by haemochromatosis patients
- Genetic screening and occupational and environmental exposures
- DBDS Genomic Cohort, a prospective and comprehensive resource for integrative and temporal analysis of genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors affecting health of blood donors
- Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
- Public participation in genetic databases: crossing the boundaries between biobanks and forensic DNA databases through the principle of solidarity
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- Altruism in organ donation: an unnecessary requirement?
- Knowledge level and motivation of Hong Kong young adults towards blood donation: a cross-sectional survey