Article Text
Abstract
The degree and nature of patient involvement in consultations with health professionals influences problem and needs recognition and management, and public accountability. This paper suggests a framework for understanding the scope for patient involvement in such consultations. Patients are defined as co-producers of formal health services, whose potential for involvement in consultations depends on their personal rights, responsibilities and preferences. Patients' rights in consultations are poorly defined and, in the National Health Service (NHS), not legally enforceable. The responsibilities of patients are also undefined. I suggest that these are not to deny, of their own volition, the rights of others, which in consultations necessitate mutuality of involvement through information-exchange and shared decision-making. Preferences should be met insofar as they do not militate against responsibilities and rights.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Real-time monitoring and feedback to improve shared decision-making for surgery (the ALPACA Study): protocol for a mixed-methods study to inform co-development of an inclusive intervention
- Can shared decision making increase the uptake of evidence in clinical practice?
- Do consultants do what they say they do? Observational study of the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process
- Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: a systematic review
- Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
- What are the links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in training programs for junior doctors? A scoping review protocol
- Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis
- Affording opportunities to discuss deterioration in paediatric palliative care consultations: a conversation analytic study
- Patient-initiated questions: How can doctors encourage them and improve the consultation process? A qualitative study
- What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study