Patients have a right to refuse medical treatment. But what should happen after a patient has refused recommended treatment? In many cases, patients receive alternative forms of treatment. These forms of care may be less cost-effective. Does respect for autonomy extend to providing these alternatives? How for does justice constrain autonomy? I begin by providing three arguments that such alternatives should not be offered to those who refuse treatment. I argue that the best argument which refusers can appeal to is based on the egalitarian principle of equality of outcome. However, this principle does not ultimately support a right to less cost-effective alternatives. I focus on Jehovah's Witnesses refusing blood and requesting alternative treatments. However, the point applies to many patients who refuse cost-effective medical care.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- Children of Jehovah’s Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah’s Witnesses: what are their rights?
- Disfigured anatomies and imperfect analogies: body integrity identity disorder and the supposed right to self-demanded amputation of healthy body parts
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?
- Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
- Examining the ethico-legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- Applying the four principles
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics