Article info
PDFResearch Article
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?
Citation
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 1. Should bioethical deliberation consider dissidents' views?
Publication history
- First published August 1, 1998.
Online issue publication
September 29, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Applying the four principles
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Why some Jehovah's Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society blood policy
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions