Jehovah's Witnesses' (JWs) refusal of blood transfusions has recently gained support in the medical community because of the growing popularity of "no-blood" treatment. Many physicians, particularly so-called "sympathetic doctors", are establishing a close relationship with this religious organization. On the other hand, it is little known that this blood doctrine is being strongly criticized by reform-minded current and former JWs who have expressed conscientious dissent from the organization. Their arguments reveal religious practices that conflict with many physicians' moral standards. They also suggest that a certain segment of "regular" or orthodox JWs may have different attitudes towards the blood doctrine. The author considers these viewpoints and argues that there are ethical flaws in the blood doctrine, and that the medical community should reconsider its supportive position. The usual physician assumption that JWs are acting autonomously and uniformly in refusing blood is seriously questioned.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Applying the four principles
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- Why some Jehovah's Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society blood policy
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions