In a controversial paper, David Seedhouse argues that medical ethics is not and cannot be a distinct discipline with it own field of study. He derives this claim from a characterization of ethics, which he states but does not defend. He claims further that the project of medical ethics as it exists and of moral philosophy do not overlap. I show that Seedhouse's views on ethics have wide implications which he does not declare, and in the light of this argue that Seedhouse owes us a defence of his characterization of ethics. Further, I show that his characterization of ethics, which he uses to attack medical ethics, is a committed position within moral philosophy. As a consequence of this, it does not allow the relation between moral philosophy and medical ethics to be discussed without prejudice to its outcome. Finally, I explore the relation between Seedhouse's position and naturalism, and its implications for medical epistemology. I argue that this shows us that Seedhouse's position, if it can be defended, is likely to lead to a fruitful and important line of inquiry which reconnects philosophy and medical ethics.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Medical ethics: principles, persons, and perspectives: from controversy to conversation
- Arguments at cross-purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics
- Bioethics and health and human rights: a critical view
- Medical ethics manual: does it serve its purpose?
- Can bioethics be an honest way of making a living? A reflection on normativity, governance and expertise
- The formative years: medical ethics comes of age
- Medical humanities: lineage, excursionary sketch and rationale
- Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration