Article info
PDFResearch Article
Autonomy and paternalism in geriatric medicine. The Jewish ethical approach to issues of feeding terminally ill patients, and to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Citation
Autonomy and paternalism in geriatric medicine. The Jewish ethical approach to issues of feeding terminally ill patients, and to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Publication history
- First published February 1, 1998.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Withholding artificial feeding from the severely demented: merciful or immoral? Contrasts between secular and Jewish perspectives
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study
- Survey on advance care planning of Italian outpatients on chronic haemodialysis
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Nurses’ attitudes towards artificial food or fluid administration in patients with dementia and in terminally ill patients: a review of the literature
- The resuscitation game continues: what is really going on?
- Deciding about resuscitation
- ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ discussions at the point of discharge: a case note review of hospice practice following local integrated policy implementation