Article Text
Research Article
The ethics of compulsory removal under section 47 of the 1948 National Assistance Act.
Abstract
Orders for removal under Section 47 of the 1948 National Assistance Act are little discussed. However, they involve severe infringements of the civil liberties of those affected. It is argued that all previously presented justifications for the use of these orders fail. Repeal of the act is called for. The Law Commission has drafted alternative legislation, but this has not been enacted. Until this occurs local authorities, the Faculty of Public Health Medicine and individual public health physicians should refuse to be involved in its use.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Society for Social Medicine 1977–1992
- Developing a multi-disciplinary public health specialist workforce: training implications of current UK policy
- Will you blossom in public health medicine?
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome: a challenge for public health practice in Hong Kong
- User requirements and understanding of public health networks in England
- Public health nudges: weighing individual liberty and population health benefits
- Can primary care groups and trusts improve health?
- Public health conference
- When ethical reform became law: the constitutional concerns raised by recent legislation in Taiwan
- Geoffrey Joseph Bourke