An ethics concerned with health care developments and systems must be historically continuous, especially as it concerns the application to managed structures of key moral-epistemic concepts such as care, love and empathy. These concepts are traditionally most at home in the personal, individual domain. Human beings have non-instrumental worth just because they are human beings and not by virtue of their capacities. Managed health care systems tend to abstract from this worth in respect of both individuals' distinctness and individual identity. The first, a common feature of quantitative approaches to health care assessment and delivery, is avoidable. The second, by contrast, is necessarily sacrificed in impersonally managed structures. Failure to distinguish the two encourages confusion and distress, and the demand for impossible medico-moral relationships.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The need for empathetic healthcare systems
- Just compassion: implications for the ethics of the scarcity paradigm in clinical healthcare provision
- Unlocking medical leadership’s potential: a multilevel virtuous circle?
- Pandemic and the human factor
- Ethics in cross-cultural encounters: a medical concern?
- Empathy and affect: what can empathied bodies do?
- The future vision of simulation in health care
- From behavioural simulation to computer models: how simulation can be used to improve healthcare management and policy
- Critical social framework on the determinants of primary healthcare access and utilisation
- Critical orientations for humanising health sciences education in South Africa