Article Text
Abstract
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a valuable procedure which must be learnt and practised, and performing ETI on cadavers is probably the best way to do this, although lesser alternatives do exist. Performing ETI on a cadaver is viewed with a real and reasonable repugnance and if it is done without proper authorisation it might be illegal. Some form of consent is required. Presumed consent would preferably be governed by statute and should only occur if the community is well informed and therefore in a position of being able to decline. Currently neither statute nor adequate informing exists. Endotracheal intubation on the newly dead may be justifiable according to a Guttman scale if the patient has already consented to organ donation and if further research supports the relevance of the Guttman scale to this question. A "mandated choice" with prior individual consent as a matter of public policy is the best of these solutions, however until such a solution is in place we may not practise endotracheal intubation on the newly dead.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- Modified mandated choice for organ procurement
- Advance commitment: an alternative approach to the family veto problem in organ procurement
- The UK Human Tissue Act and consent: surrendering a fundamental principle to transplantation needs?
- Normative consent and opt-out organ donation
- Meeting the demand for donor organs in the US
- Non-heart beating organ donation: old procurement strategy—new ethical problems
- Presumed consent for transplantation: a dead issue after Alder Hey?
- Tacitly consenting to donate one's organs
- A nudge in the right direction for organ donation—but is it enough?
- An antidote to the emerging two tier organ donation policy in Canada: the Public Cadaveric Organ Donation Program