Savulescu has recently introduced the "rational non-interventional paternalist" model of the patient-doctor relationship. This paper addresses objections to such a model from the perspective of an anaesthetist. Patients need to make their own decisions if they are to be fully autonomous. Rational non-interventional paternalism undermines the importance of patient choice and so threatens autonomy. Doctors should provide an evaluative judgment of the best medical course of action, but ought to restrict themselves to helping patients to make their own choices rather than making such choices for them.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- False dichotomies: EBM, clinical freedom, and the art of medicine
- Consent for anaesthesia
- Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- Whose information is it anyway? Informing a 12-year-old patient of her terminal prognosis
- Dismembering the ethical physician
- Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting
- Should doctor assisted dying be legal?
- Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it
- Professional-patient relationships and informed consent