Traditionally clinicians have determined their patients' resuscitation status without consultation. This has been condemned as morally indefensible in cases where not for resuscitation (NFR) orders are based on quality of life considerations and when the patient's true wishes are not known. Such instances would encompass most resuscitation decisions in elderly patients. Having previously involved patients in CPR decision-making, we chose formally to explore the reasons behind the choices made. Although the patients were not upset, and readily decided at the time of initial consultation, on later analysing the decision-making we found poor understanding of the procedure, poor recall of information given and in some cases evidence of harm. This may be attributed to impaired decision-making capacity of elderly hospitalised patients as previously shown, or to the discomfort precipitated by having to contemplate the apparent immediacy of cardiac arrest by these patients. We propose that subscribing to autonomy as a general principle needs to be balanced against particular cases where distress may be caused by, or result in, diminished competence and limited autonomy.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care
- Ethical issues surrounding do not attempt resuscitation orders: decisions, discussions and deleterious effects
- Resuscitation decisions at the end of life: medical views and the juridification of practice
- Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better
- To what extent should older patients be included in decisions regarding their resuscitation status?
- CPR decision-making conversations in the UK: an integrative review
- Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients
- Should non-disclosures be considered as morally equivalent to lies within the doctor–patient relationship?