Article info
PDFResearch Article
The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.
Citation
The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.
Publication history
- First published June 1, 1997.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- Informed consent in medical research: Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent–with three exceptions
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Ethics, human rights and HIV vaccine trials in low-income settings
- Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities