The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- The views of members of Local Research Ethics Committees, researchers and members of the public towards the roles and functions of LRECs.
Other content recommended for you
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- Meeting the challenges facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- Informed consent in medical research: Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent–with three exceptions
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Ethics, human rights and HIV vaccine trials in low-income settings
- Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities