The issue of abortion is discussed with reference to the claim that people have a right of control over their own bodies. Do people "own" their own bodies? If so, what would be entailed? These questions are discussed in commonsense terms and also in relation to the jurisprudence of Hohfeld, Honore, Munzer and Waldron. It is argued that whether or not women are morally and/or should be legally entitled to have abortions, such entitlements cannot be derived from a general moral entitlement to do what we will with our own bodies since there is no such entitlement. Whether or not we "own" them, we can have rights duties, liabilities, restrictions and disadvantages as well as rights concerning our own bodies.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Obedient mothers, healthy children: communication on the risks of reproduction in state-socialist Czechoslovakia
- The moral significance of being born
- The Israeli abortion committees' process of decision making: an ethical analysis
- The place for individual conscience
- How Danes evaluate moral claims related to abortion: a questionnaire survey
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion