Medical futility and the social context.
The concept of medical futility has come to be seen in some quarters as a value-neutral trump card when dealing with issues of power and conflicting values in medicine. I argue that this concept is potentially useful, but only in a social context that provides a normative framework for its use. This social context needs to include a broad consensus about the purpose of medicine and the nature of the physician-patient relationship.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Medical futility: a conceptual model
- The development of “medical futility”: towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession
- Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine
- Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis
- Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework
- Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment
- Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians
- Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life
- Why the term ‘persistent therapy’ is not worse than the term ‘medical futility’
- Conditions and consequences of medical futility—from a literature review to a clinical model