Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the willingness of insured citizens to trade off their own health benefits to cover the uninsured.
DESIGN: Descriptive study of individual and group decisions and decision making using quantitative and qualitative methods.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine groups of citizens (N=282) residing throughout Minnesota.
INTERVENTIONS: Groups participated in Choosing Health-plans All Together (CHAT), a simulation exercise in which participants choose whether and how extensively to cover health services in a hypothetical health plan constrained by limited resources. We describe individual and group decisions, and group dialogue concerning whether to allocate 2% of their premium to cover uninsured children in Minnesota, or 4% of their premium to cover uninsured children and adults.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: While discussing coverage for the uninsured, groups presented arguments about personal responsibility, community benefit, caring for the vulnerable, social impact, and perceptions of personal risk. All groups chose to insure children; 22 of 29 groups also insured adults. More individuals chose to cover the uninsured at the end of the exercise, after group deliberation, than before (66% vs 54%; P<.001). Individual selections differed from group selections more often for the uninsured category than any other. Nevertheless, 89% of participants were willing to abide by the health plan developed by their group.
CONCLUSION: In the context of tradeoffs with their own health insurance benefits, groups of Minnesotans presented value-based arguments about covering the uninsured. All 29 groups and two thirds of individuals chose to contribute a portion of their premium to insure all children and most groups chose also to insure uninsured adults.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blendon RJ, Schoen C, DesRoches CM, Osborn R, Scoles KL, Zapert K. Inequities in health care: a five-country survey. Health Aff. 2002;21:182–91.
Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. Care Without Coverage: Too Little, Too Late. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
Editorial Staff. Back burner for insurance. The Los Angeles Times. August 29, 2001:812.
No health insurance? It’s enough to make you sick. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine; 2000.
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard School of Public Health/Princeton Survey Research Associates Poll. Storrs, Conn: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research; November 4, 1998.
Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Brodie M, Altman DE, James M, Hugick L. Voters and health care in the 1998 election. JAMA. 1999;282:189–94.
Drazen J, Bush G, Gore A. The Republican and Democratic candidates speak on health care. N Engl J Med. 2000;3:1184–9.
Public Opinion Strategies and Lake Snell Perry Associates. Health Coverage 2000 Uninsured Survey, October 12, 1999, Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/news/eventshc2000/summary.htm. Accessed May 25, 2004.
Public Opinion Strategies and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, April 28–30, 2002. Available at: http://www.pos.org/latestnumbers/npr.asp. Accessed May 25, 2004.
Goold SD, Biddle AK, Danis M. Choosing healthplans all together: a game to assess consumer values and preferences for health insurance. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:S68.
Danis M, Biddle AK, Goold SD. Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:125–33.
Mechanic D, Ettel T, Davis D. Choosing among health insurance options: a study of new employees. Inquiry. 1990;27:14–23.
Danis M, Biddle AK, Henderson G, Garreett JM, DeVellis RF. Elderly Medicare enrollees’ choices for insured services. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:688–94.
Biddle AK, DeVellis RF, Henderson G, Fasick SB, Danis M. The health insurance puzzle: a new approach to assessing patient coverage. J Community Health. 1998;23:181–94.
Danis M, Biddle AK, Goold SD. Enrollees choose priorities for Medicare. Gerontologist. 2004;44:58–67.
Tyler T. Psychological models of the justice motive: antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:850–63.
Tyler T, Degoey P, Smith H. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: a test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:913–30.
Lind EA, Tyler TR, Huo YJ. Procedural context and culture: variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73:767–80.
Lind EA, Kanfer R, Earley PC. Voice, control, and procedural justice: instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgements. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59:952–9.
Student. On the error of counting with a haemacytomer. Biometrika 1907;5:351.
Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Am Statist Assoc. 1959;58:690–700.
McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrica. 1947;12:153–7.
Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. Coverage Matters: Insurance and Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
Kaiser Family Foundation Health Poll Report survey, April 2004. Available at: http://www.kff.org/healthpollreport/CurrentEdition/security/1.cfm. Accessed May 25, 2004.
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press; 1971.
Churchill LR. Self-Interest and Universal Health Insurance: Why Well-insured Americans Should Support Coverage for Everyone. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1994.
Peterson MA. Kenneth Arrow and the changing economics of health care. J Health Polit Policy Law. (Special Issue) 2001;26:823–8.
Hirschman A. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1970.
Emanuel E. Justice and managed care: four principles for the just allocation of health care resources. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000;30:8–16.
Goold SD. Allocating health care resources: cost utility analysis, informed democratic decision making, or the veil of ignorance? J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21:69–98.
Eddy D. Connecting value and costs: whom do we ask, and what do we ask them? JAMA. 1990;264:1737–9.
Fleck L. Just health care rationing: a democratic decision-making approach. Univ Penn Law Rev. 1992;140:1597–636.
Fleck L. Just caring: Oregon, health care rationing, and informed democratic deliberation. J Med Philos. 1994;19:367–88.
Benhabib S. Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In: Benhabib, S, ed. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:67–94.
Gutmann A, Thompson D. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press; 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported in part by the Allina Foundation. Dr. Goold and coauthors received the 2002 Mark S. Ehrenreich Prize for Research in Healthcare Ethics for the work reported in this paper. Dr. Goold was a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Generalist Faculty Scholar during the research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goold, S.D., Green, S.A., Biddle, A.K. et al. Will insured citizens give up benefit coverage to include the uninsured?. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 868–874 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.32102.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.32102.x