Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Infection by porcine endogenous retrovirus after islet xenotransplantation in SCID mice

Abstract

Animal donors such as pigs could provide an alternative source of organs for transplantation. However, the promise of xenotransplantation is offset by the possible public health risk of a cross-species infection1,2. All pigs contain several copies of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV)3,4, and at least three variants of PERV can infect human cell lines in vitro in co-culture, infectivity and pseudotyping experiments3,5,6,7. Thus, if xenotransplantation of pig tissues results in PERV viral replication, there is a risk of spreading and adaptation of this retrovirus to the human host. C-type retroviruses related to PERV are associated with malignancies of haematopoietic lineage cells in their natural hosts8. Here we show that pig pancreatic islets produce PERV and can infect human cells in culture. After transplantation into NOD/SCID (non-obese diabetic, severe combined immunodeficiency) mice, we detect ongoing viral expression and several tissue compartments become infected. This is the first evidence that PERV is transcriptionally active and infectious cross-species in vivo after transplantation of pig tissues. These results show that a concern for PERV infection risk associated with pig islet xenotransplantation in immunosuppressed human patients may be justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Pig islets release infectious PERV virions and productively infect human U293 cells.
Figure 2: PERV expression in pig islets after transplantation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chapman, L. E. et al. Xenotransplantation and xenogeneic infections. N. Eng. J. Med. 333, 1498–1501 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoye, J. P. Xenotransplantation. Proviruses pose potential problems. Nature 386, 126–127 ( 1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Patience, C., Takeuchi, Y. & Weiss, R. A. Infection of human cells by an endogenous retrovirus of pigs. Nature Med. 3, 282– 286 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Akiyoshi, D. E. et al. Identification of a full-length cDNA for an endogenous retrovirus of miniature swine. J. Virol. 72, 4503– 4507 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Le Tissier, P., Stoye, J. P., Takeuchi, Y., Patience, C. & Weiss, R. A. Two sets of human-tropic pig retrovirus. Nature 389, 681–682 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takeuchi, Y. et al. Host range and interference studies of three classes of pig endogenous retrovirus. J. Virol. 72, 9986 –9991 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, C. A. et al. Type C retrovirus released from porcine primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells infects human cells. J. Virol. 72, 3082–3087 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Toth, S. R., Onions, D. E. & Jarrett, O. Histopathological and hematological findings in myeloid leukemia induced by a new feline leukemia virus isolate. Vet. Pathol. 23, 462–470 ( 1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hesselton, R. M. et al. High levels of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell engraftment and enhanced susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in NOD/LtSz-scid/scid mice. J. Infect. Dis. 172, 974–982 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCune, J. M. et al. The SCID-hu mouse: murine model for the analysis of human hematolymphoid differentiation and function. Science 241, 1632–1639 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crisa, L. et al. Human cord blood progenitors sustain thymic T-cell development and a novel form of angiogenesis. Blood 94, 3928–3940 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyoshi, H., Smith, K. A., Mosier, D. E., Verma, I. M. & Torbett, B. E. Transduction of human CD34+ cells that mediate long-term engraftment of NOD/SCID mice by HIV vectors. Science 283, 682–686 ( 1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heneine, W. et al. No evidence of infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of porcine islet-cell xenografts. Lancet 352, 695–699 (1998); erratum Lancet 352, 1478 ( 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paradis, K. et al. Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. Science 285, 1236–1241 ( 1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy, J. A. Xenotropic viruses: murine leukemia viruses associated with NIH Swiss, NZB, and other mouse strains. Science 182, 1151 –1153 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamont, C. et al. Characterization of endogenous and recombinant proviral elements of a highly tumorigenic AKR cell line. J. Virol. 65 , 4619–4628 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Patience, C. et al. No evidence of pig DNA or retroviral infection in patients with short-term extracorporeal connection to pig kidneys. Lancet 352, 699–701 ( 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, C A., Wong, S., VanBrocklin, M. & Federspiel, M. J. Extended analysis of the in vitro tropism of porcine endogenous retrovirus. J. Virol. 74, 49–56 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandrin, M. S. & McKenzie, I. F. Recent advances in xenotransplantation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11, 527–531 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiss, R. A. Transgenic pigs and virus adaptation. Nature 391, 327–328 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Beattie, G. M. & Hayek, A. Outcome of human fetal pancreatic transplants according to implantation site. Transpl. Proc. 26, 3299 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, X. et al. Prolongation of porcine islet allograft survival. Transpl. Proc. 29, 768–769 ( 1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Elder, A. Pelletier, J. Coffin, J. Stoye and G. Langford for helpful discussions, and D. Stablein for expert statistical advice. We thank I. Mychkovsky and T. Gladden for assistance in mRNA/DNA purification, T. Gilmore, J. Ansite and D. Scharpe for assistance in purification of pig islets, and L. Crisa, P. Hildbrand and O. Schussler for help with mouse surgery. We thank R. Ingram and M. Pierschbacher for the RGD collagen templates for transplantation. D.R.S, B.C.G., F.S.F., B.E.T. and this work are supported by an NIH/NIAID grant. L.J.W.L. is supported by a Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International (JDFI) fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Salomon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Laan, L., Lockey, C., Griffeth, B. et al. Infection by porcine endogenous retrovirus after islet xenotransplantation in SCID mice. Nature 407, 90–94 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35024089

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35024089

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing