Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in Self-Reported Response to Troubles Talk

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tannen [(1990) You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation, New York: William Morrow] and others have argued that women and men differ in communication style, and particularly in the way they respond to “troubles talk.” However, her research on gender differences in communication style has primarily made use of qualitative analysis of naturally occurring discourse. A Communication Styles Survey was developed to assess self-reported behavioral and emotional responses in “troubles talk” situations. This survey was administered to a total of 384 participants, the majority of whom were Caucasian college students. Statistically significant gender differences consistent with Tannen's predictions were found but the effect sizes tended to be small. Self-reported responses to troubles talk (such as giving advice) showed consistent individual differences among persons; for example, some persons tend to report themselves as “advice givers” or “jokers” across a wide range of troubles talk situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bernard, J. (1972). Early gender differences in the functional usage of language. Sex Roles, 12, 909-915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indvik, J., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1982). Sex differences in imagined interactions. Sex Roles, 21, 263-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, D. R. (1993). The men we never knew. Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaud, S. L. (1991, August). Gender and communication styles. Paper presented at the McNair Graduate Opportunities Program Conference, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH.

  • Murphy, K. R., Herr, B. M., Lockhart, M. C., & Maguire, E. (1986). Evaluating the performance of paper people. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 654-661. (use this in discussion, under limitations of our methodology)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.) (1955). Family, socialization, and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1986). That's not what I meant: How conversational style makes or breaks relationships. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michaud, S.L., Warner, R.M. Gender Differences in Self-Reported Response to Troubles Talk. Sex Roles 37, 527–540 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025606918913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025606918913

Keywords

Navigation