Skip to main content
Log in

A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach: The DIT and Schema Theory

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Macromorality” concerns the formal structure of society, as defined by institutions, rules, and roles. “Micromorality” concerns the particular face-to-face relations that people have in everyday life. Kohlbergian theories are most useful for issues of macromorality. The Defining Issues Test (DIT) derives from Kohlberg's approach but makes several departures, including defining cognitive structures in terms of schemas instead of stages, reformulating the definition of postconventional moral thinking, and using different research strategies. The validity of the DIT is based on seven criteria (briefly discussed), and hundreds of studies have produced significant trends. Recent research derived from schema theory produces novel phenomena that link our theory of moral schemas more closely with information processing and decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adelson, J. (1971). The political imagination of the young adolescent. Daedalus 100: 1013-1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. L. (1999). Stage, sequence, and sequels: Changing conceptions of morality, post-Kohlberg. Educ. Psychol. Rev. (in press).

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence on social perception and cognition. In Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A. (eds.), Unintended Thought, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebeau, M. J., and Thoma, S. J. (1999). Intermediate concepts and the connection to moral education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 11: 345-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., and Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., and Lieberman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Society for Research in Child Development: Monograph Series, 48, No. 4, Chicago.

  • Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Speicher, B., Hewer, A., Candee, D., Gibbs, J., and Power, C. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgment, Vols. 1 and 2, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, J., Shames, V. A., and Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. In Underwood, G. (ed.), Implicit Cognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 257-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Souza, D. (1991). Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., Palmer-Canton, and St. James (In press). Politics, moral reasoning and the Defining Issues Test: A reply to Barnett et al. (1995). Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 37: 457-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., Renwick, S., and Malone, B. (1983). The relationship between moral reasoning and political orientation. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 45: 1073-1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., and Smith, J. (1991). Toward a General Theory of Expertise, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evens, J. (1995). Indexing Moral Judgment Using Multidimensional Scaling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

  • Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1963). The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, P. (1966). Age of Enlightenment, Time-Life Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., and Mangun, G. R. (1998). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. R., and Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttmann, A., and Thompson, D. (1997). Democracy and Disagreement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (1993). The Anatomy of Antiliberalism, Harvard, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J. (1994). Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., and Smith, J. (eds.), Toward a General Theory of Expertise, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 301-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F., Shames, V. A., and Dorfman, J. (1996). Intimations of memory and thought. In Reder, L. (ed.), Implicit Memory and Metacognition, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., and Hart, D. (1995). Morality in Everyday Life, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In Mischel, T. (ed.), Cognitive Development and Epistemology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 151-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In Lickona, T. (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 31-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1979). Foreword. In Rest, J. (ed.), Development in Judging Moral Issues, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. vii-xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 1. The Philosophy of Moral Development, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on Moral Development: The nature and validity of moral stages, Vol. 2, Harper & Row, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., Boyd, D. R., and Levine, C. (1990). The return of Stage 6: Its principle and moral point of view. In Wren, T. (ed.), The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 151-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst-Wilson, W. R., and Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207: 557-558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, D. K. (1996). Moral Psychology, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, P. (1986). Non-conscious Social Information Processing, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (1995). The meaning and measurement of moral competence revisited. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Locke, D. (1986). A psychologist among the philosophers: Philosophical aspects of Kohlberg's theories. In Modgil, S., and Modgil, C. (eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy, Falmer Press, Philadelphia, pp. 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louren, O., and Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychol. Rev. 103(1): 143-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. E., and Appleby, R. S. (eds.) (1991). Fundamentalisms Observed, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. E., and Appleby, R. S. (eds.) (1993). Fundamentalism and the State, University of Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, H., and Brill, A. (1983). Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe About Civil Liberties, Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modgil, S., and Modgil, C. (eds.) (1986). Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy, Falmer Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (1999). Using discourse processing methods to study moral thinking. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 11: 379-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D., Getz, I., Thoma, S. J., and Rest, J. (1999). Individual moral judgment and cultural ideology. Dev. Psychol. 35: 478-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1986/1968). Beyond Good and Evil (translation by W. Kaufman), The Portable Nietzsche, Viking Press, New York, pp. 443-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84(3): 231-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, M. S. (1999). What psychological research can contribute to educational programs for the moral development of professionals. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 11: 397-411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Harvard Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. R. C. (1997). Following Kohlberg: Liberalism and the Practice of the Democratic Community, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1973). The hierarchical nature of stages of moral judgment. J. Person. 41: 86-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1979). Development in Judging Moral Issues, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., and Narvaez, D. (eds.) (1994). Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S. J., and Edwards, L. (1997a). Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. J. Educ. Psychol. 89(1): 5-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S. J., Narvaez, D., and Bebeau, M. J. (1997b). Alchemy and beyond: Indexing the Defining Issues Test. J. Educ. Psychol. 89(3): 498-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Mitchell, C., Narvaez, D., and Thoma, S. J. (1999a). How test length affects validity and reliability on the Defining Issues Test (submitted for publication).

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., and Thoma, S. J. (1999b). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach, Lawrence Erlbaum Press, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., and Thoma, S. J. (1999c). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychol. (in press).

  • Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Mitchell, C., and Thoma, S. J. (1999). Exploring Moral Judgment: A Technical Manual for the Defining Issues Test. Minneapolis; Center for the Study of Ethical Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S. J., and Narvaez, D. (1999d). Moral judgment and ideology (submitted for publication).

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S. J., and Narvaez, D. (1999e). Moral judgment: Stages and schemas (submitted for publication).

  • Rummelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R., Bruce, B., and Brewer, W. (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 33-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for Memory, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1982). Review of Lawrence Kohlberg's Essays on moral development, Volume I: The philosophy of moral development. Contemp. Psychol. 421-424.

  • Siegler, R. S. (1997). Concepts and methods for studying cognitive change. In Amsel, E., and Renninger, K. A. (eds.), Change and Development: Issues of Theory, Method, and Application, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 77-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (1982). Concepts of Self and Morality: Women's Reasoning About Abortion, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snarey, J. (1985). The cross-cultural universality of social-moral development. Psychol. Bull. 97(2): 202-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C. L. (1937). The emotive meaning of ethical terms. Mind XLVI: 14-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., and Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In Higgins, E. T., Herman, C. P., and Zanna, M. P. (eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 1, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 89-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J. (1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Dev. Rev. 6: 165-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J. (1994). Moral judgment and moral action. In Rest, J., and Narvaez, D. (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 199-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J., and Rest, J. (1999). The relationship between decision-making and patterns of consolidation and transition in moral judgment development. Dev. Psychol. 35: 323-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J., Rest, J., and Barnett, R. (1986). Moral judgment, behavior, decision making, and attitudes. In Rest, J. (ed.), Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger, New York, pp. 133-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S., Narvaez, D., Rest, J., & Derryberry, P. (1999). The distinctiveness of moral judgment. Educ. Psychol. Rev. (in press).

  • Thornton, D., and Thornton, S. (1983). Structure, content, and the direction of development in Kohlberg's theory. In Weinreich-Haste, H., and Locke, D. (eds.), Morality in the Making: Thought, Action, and the Social Context, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 73-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1997). The development of morality. In Damon, W. (gen. ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, 5th ed. In Eisenberg, N. (vol. ed.), Social, Emotional, and Personality Development, Wiley, New York, Chap. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., and Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Memory Cognit. 8: 336-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A. (1989). Unintended Thought, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vine, I. (1986). Moral maturity in socio-cultural perspective: Are Kohlberg's stages universal? In Modgil, S., and Modgil, C. (eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy, Falmer Press, Philadelphia, pp. 431-450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, T. (ed.). (1990). The Moral Domain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich-Haste, H., and Locke, D. (eds.) (1983). Morality in the Making: Thought, Action, and the Social Context, Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., and Yates, M. (1999). Youth service and moral identity: A case for everyday morality. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 11: 363-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). The attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl. 9(2; Pt. 2).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. et al. A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach: The DIT and Schema Theory. Educational Psychology Review 11, 291–324 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022053215271

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022053215271

Navigation