Abstract
I consider the problem liberalism poses for bioethics.Liberalism is a view that advocates that the state remain neutralto views of the good life. This view is sometimes supported by askeptical moral epistemology that tends to propel liberalismtoward libertarianism. I argue that the possibilities for sharedagreement on moral matters are more promising than is sometimesappreciated by such a view of liberalism. Using two examples ofpublic debates of moral issues, I show that commonly sharedintuitions may ground moral principles even if they may be givendifferent weight by persons of different moral and religioustraditions. Nevertheless, the fact that the intuition andprinciple is widely shared may be sufficient to chart somedirections for public policy or cooperative action even if theydo not lead to complete agreement. As a result, I argue that aliberal communitarianism that presupposes a fairly minimalistepistemology is a legitimate approach to achieving sharedagreement in a pluralistic society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
MacIntyre A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.
Kuczewski MG. Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 1997.
Emanuel EJ. The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
Emanuel EJ. Where civic republicanism and deliberative democracy meet. Hastings Center Report 1996; 26(6): 12–14.
Engelhardt HT. The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd edn New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
MacIntyre A. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1981.
Moreno JD. Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Thomasma D. Aristotle, phronesis, and postmodern bioethics. In Kuczewski MG, Polansky RM, eds Bioethics: Ancient Themes in Contemporary Issues. MIT Press (forthcoming).
Wolfe A. One Nation, After All. New York: Penguin Books, 1998.
Meisel A. The ethical and legal consensus on forgoing life-sustaining treatment: Its status and prospects. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1992; 2(4): 309–345.
Kelly DF. Critical Care Ethics: Treatment Decisions in American Hospitals. Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1991.
National Conference of Catholic Bishops. Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services. United States Catholic Conference, 1995.
Doerflinger RM. An uncertain future for assisted suicide. Hastings Center Report 1999; 29(1): 52.
Bernardin J Cardinal. Consistent Ethic of Life. Kansas City, MO: Sheed & Ward, 1988.
Bernardin J Cardinal. The consistent ethics of life after Webster. In Langan JP, ed. A Moral Vision for America. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1998.
Ashley, BM, O'Rourke, KD. Health Care Ethics: A Theological Analysis, 4th edn Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1997.
Glendon MA. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press, 1991.
Fides Et Ratio: Encyclical Letter of the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Relationship Between Faith and Reason, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuczewski, M.G. The Epistemology of Communitarian Bioethics:Traditions in the Public Debates. Theor Med Bioeth 22, 135–150 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011482009875
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011482009875