Funding research into complementary medicine: the situation in Britain

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-2299(99)80011-9Get rights and content

Summary

This article outlines the theoretical options for research funding for complementary medicine in Britain. Sponsorship from the National Health Service, the Medical Research Council, Medical Research Charities, the industry and private donations constitute the main potential sources. Surveys of the actual funding spent by these sources are evaluated. The data thus generated suggest that funds for research into complementary medicine are not readily available in the UK. Several suggestions are made to ameliorate this situation and the case for ‘ring-fenced’ funding is put forward, not least on the basis of international experience.

References (10)

  • ErnstE

    Two projects for funding complementary medicine research in Germany

    Comp Ther Med

    (1996)
  • ErnstE

    Only 0.08% of funding for research in NHS goes to complementary medicine

    BMJ

    (1996)
  • Burden S. Response to inquiry by E. Ernst dated 1 July...
  • ErnstE et al.

    UK medical research charities and clinical trials

    Br J Gen Pract

    (1999)
  • ErnstE

    Major multi-national pharmaceutical companies and complementary Medicine

    Forsch Koplementärmed

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Profiling 'centres of excellence in CAM research

    2002, Complementary Therapies in Medicine
  • Complementary and alternative medicine in rheumatology

    2000, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
  • Acupuncture: Efficacy, safety and practice

    2020, Acupuncture: Efficacy, Safety and Practice
  • Ethical problems arising in evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine

    2019, Perspectives on Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Reader
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text