Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(99)90396-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The current medical environment demands the provision of quality healthcare at an affordable cost. Both payors and regulators are committed to lowering cost through initiation of best practice strategies that include practice guidelines, clinical pathways, and standards of care. The only practical way to join this debate is through the use of objective, unbiased clinical data. This study was undertaken to review the current state of the pediatric surgery literature and its value in determining best clinical practice.

Methods: The National Library of Medicine Medline database was accessed using the Ovid Internet client software. All references, abstracts, and keyword indexes from the core pediatric surgery literature, the Journal of Pediatric Surgery, the European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Surgery International, Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie, and Seminars in Pediatric Surgery were downloaded and reviewed. Search criteria were defined to identify prospective, randomized, controlled studies. References were then categorized as case reports; retrospective case series; prospective case series; randomized, controlled studies; laboratory studies; review articles; or miscellaneous studies.

Results: As of March 1, 1998, there are 9,373 references, excluding citations of letters or comments, contained in the core pediatric surgery literature, as provided through Medline. Of these, 485 were identified as studies for review, possible prospective case series or prospective, randomized, controlled studies. After review, 34 studies (0.3%) were classified as prospective, randomized, controlled studies, whereas 139 (1.48%) were classified as prospective studies. There were 3,241 (34.6%) case reports, 5,619 (59.9%) retrospective case series, 1,109 (11.8%) laboratory studies, 195 (2.1%) review articles, and 36 (0.3%) miscellaneous studies that did not fit into other categories. When analyzed by decade of publication, prospective studies and prospective, randomized, controlled studies (n = 173) numbered 103 in the 1990s, 63 in the 1980s, and seven in the 1970s.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of scientifically rigorous data on which to base clinical practice in pediatric surgery. The increasing numbers of prospective, case-controlled studies or the more sound prospective, randomized, controlled trials in the 1990s suggests that pediatric surgeons are aware of the need to generate unbiased data to support current clinical practice and the development of practice guidelines. Limitations exist in conducting prospective, randomized, controlled trials because of the rare nature of many pediatric surgical conditions and the lack of clinical “equipoise” over available treatment options. The authors encourage the use of multiin-stitutional trials and the prospective, randomized, controlled study methodology to develop data that can be used to guide clinical practice in our evolving healthcare environment.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (91)

  • Development of a multi-institutional clinical research consortium for pediatric surgery

    2017, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Prospective trials can overcome many of these limitations, but the number of prospective trials in pediatric surgery has been limited. In recent reviews of pediatric surgery publications, only 1.5% were prospective studies and < 0.4% were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [1,2,3]. Furthermore, many of the RCTs that have been performed in pediatric surgery have been noted to have flaws in study design, randomization techniques, sample size calculations, or inadequate power or statistical analysis to demonstrate a difference between treatment arms [1,3].

  • Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based practice by pediatric surgeons

    2017, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Nurses also indicated a desire to have an EBP mentor [22,23]. Previous studies investigating EBP in pediatric surgeons have hypothesized that a substantial barrier was the lack of high quality RCTs [2,3]. To substantiate this, Hardin et al. (1999) conducted a review of all available literature published in five core pediatric surgery journals up to 1998.

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes for various surgical modalities in the management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis

    2015, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several obstacles have been proposed to explain the paucity of randomized trials and other high-quality prospective study designs. These include the rarity of many surgical conditions, diminishing funding in support of clinical trials, difficulty with standardizing surgical procedures, surgeon preference for specific operations, and the reluctance of patients to assign their children randomly to a potentially invasive treatment arm, among others.75–82 Although no significant publication bias was observed using funnel plots, it is still feasible that negative or null findings from studies were not published, leading to publication bias and possibly accounting for the small number of studies in this review.

  • A pilot investigation of a pediatric surgery journal club

    2014, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    These results are summarized in Fig. 3. It has been well demonstrated that one of the main barriers to evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery is the lack of high level studies to inform clinical decision-making [4,12,13]. Even when a well-conducted trial is performed, recognized hurdles inhibit practice change by impeding the dissemination, acceptance and application of that evidence.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Section on Surgery of the American Academy of Pediatrics, San Francisco, California, October 16–19, 1998.

View full text