Cost-effectiveness league tables: More harm than good?
References (38)
- et al.
Cost-effectiveness of antepartum prevention of Rh immunization
Clinics Perinatol
(1984) - et al.
Cost-effectiveness/utility analyses: do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be?
J. Hlth Econ.
(1992) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal
J. Hlth Econ.
(1986)- et al.
The use of QALYs in health care decision making
Soc. Sci. Med.
(1989) - et al.
Applications of cost-benefit analysis to health care: Departures from welfare economic theory
J. Hlth Econ.
(1987) Economics of coronary artery bypass grafting
B. Med. J.
(1985)- et al.
Cost-effectiveness of low-dose zidovudine therapy for asymptomatic patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Annls internal Med.
(1991) - et al.
Costs and effectiveness of routine therapy with long-term beta-adrenergic antagonists after acute myocardial infarction
N. Engl. J. Med.
(1988) - et al.
How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations
Can. Med. Assoc. J.
(1992) Setting health care priorities in Oregon: cost-effectiveness meets the Rule of Rescue
JAMA
(1991)
Oregon's methods: did cost-effectiveness analysis fail?
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
Output measurement for resource allocations in health care
Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy
quality-adjusted life-years, utility theory and healthy years equivalents
Med. Decision Making
A review of cost-utility studies: assessing their policy-making relevance
Priority setting for AIDS and other health care programmes
A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programmes
Hlth Services Res.
Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organisations
Int. J. Technol. Assess. Hlth Care
Developing the health care market
Econ. J.
Cited by (206)
A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017
2018, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :Since the return to a non-sectioned journal in 1982, there have been many health economics papers published, with a number of outstanding contributions to the discipline from across the globe. Some of the highly-cited contributions include papers focusing on issues around: equity and inequality (Deaton and Lubotsky, 2003; Goddard and Smith, 2001; Hawe and Shiell, 2000; McIntyre et al., 2006; Morris et al., 2005; Van Doorslaer and Gerdtham, 2003; Wagstaff et al., 1991); agency relationships (Charles et al., 1997, 1999; Gafni et al., 1998); health care systems (Gilson, 2003); determinants of health (Evans and Stoddart, 1990; Filmer and Pritchett, 1999; Ng et al., 2009); cost and resource use measurement (Koopmanschap and van Ineveld, 1992; Zhang et al., 2011) and its determinants (Dunlop et al., 2000; French et al., 2000; McDonald and Kennedy, 2004); measuring health outcomes (Drummond et al., 1993; Loomes and McKenzie, 1989; Marra et al., 2005; Nord, 1992; Robinson et al., 1997; van Agt et al., 1994) and broader wellbeing in the health context (Blanchflower and Oswald, 2008; Coast et al., 2008a; Ryan, 1999); and methods for economic evaluation more generally (Gafni and Birch, 2006). Whilst shifts in published topics in Social Science & Medicine to a great extent mirror the broader concerns of health economists (with, for example, extensive publication on Quality Adjusted- Life Years (QALYs) in the late 1980s and 1990s), a number of the economics contributions to the journal have been characterised by being somewhat outside the mainstream of health economics.
A Tale of Two Thresholds: A Framework for Prioritization within the Cancer Drugs Fund
2016, Value in HealthCitation Excerpt :This model makes use of the league-table search approach to threshold determination and applies it to the CDF. First proposed by Gafni and Birch [27,28], and the subject of much debate within the health economics literature [9,29], the league-table approach is a well-validated method for cost-effectiveness threshold elicitation, both in theory and in practice. Although excessive informational requirements render this approach infeasible for informing NHS-level questions of resource allocation [23,24,29], this approach has been successfully applied to more modest NHS decision problems, including the estimation of “local” cost-effectiveness thresholds at the primary care trust level [24].
Outcomes and health economic issues in surgery
2013, Core Topics in General and Emergency Surgery, Fifth EditionEmpirical evaluation of continuous auditing system use: a systematic review
2023, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering