How well is the patient self-determination act working?: An early assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(93)90358-VGet rights and content

Abstract

objectives: To assess the association between implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) and (1) the use of formal, written advance directives, (2) the use of informal advance care arrangements, and (3) discussions between patients and their physicians and proxies on advance care planning and end-of-life treatment preferences.

design: A time-sequence study in which patients discharged from acute care hospitals 1 month before the implementation of the PSDA and 5 months after implementation of the PSDA were interviewed.

setting: Two medical school-affiliated, major teaching hospitals with more than 500 beds and 3 nonteaching community hospitals with fewer than 400 beds in eastern Massachusetts.

patients: A total of 579 adult patients were interviewed: 258 patients discharged before the implementation of the PSDA (pre-PSDA) and 321 patients discharged 5 months after implementation of the PSDA (post-PSDA).

measurements: Patients were asked about their formal, written or informal advance care planning arrangements, about the frequency of inquiries and information provided on advance care planning by the hospitals, and about their discussions of advance care planning and end-of-life treatment preferences with physicians and their proxies.

results: In the pre-PSDA cohort, 60.9% of the patients had some kind of advance care planning, whereas in the post-PSDA cohort, 72.6% did (p = 0.01). However, there was not a significant increase in the proportion of patients who had advance care planning “in a written document” (19.8% of the pre-PSDA cohort compared with 25.5% of the post-PSDA cohort, p = 0.11). The increase in written advance care planning was concentrated in the community, nonteaching hospitals (10.7% pre-PSDA versus 23.7% post-PSDA). Overall, 41.4% of patients recalled inquiries or information about advance care planning during their hospitalization.

Implementation of the PSDA was not associated with a significant change in the proportion of patients who discussed advance care planning or end-of-life issues with their physicians (13.6% pre-PSDA versus 17.1 % post-PSDA, p = 0.25). However, there was an increase in the proportion of patients with poorer health who spoke with their physicians (15.4% pre-PSDA versus 24.8% post-PSDA).

Implementation of the PSDA was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who had general discussions with proxies about end-of-life issues (61.8% pre-PSDA versus 73.0% post-PSDA, p = 0.024). However, 33.6% of pre-PSDA and 33.2% of post-PSDA patients had detailed discussions with their proxy about specific interventions such as mechanical ventilation or artificial nutrition. Patients with formal proxies had detailed discussions significantly more frequently than other patients (50.0% versus 26.8%, p <0.0001).

conclusions: The PSDA was associated with significant effects on general advance care planning issues, increasing the proportion of patients who had (1) some kind of advance care arrangements and (2) general discussions of end-of-life issues with their proxies. However, the PSDA did not appear associated with significant increases (1) in the use of formal, written advance care documents, (2) in the frequency of discussions between patients and their physicians on advance care documents or end-of-life issues, or (3) in the frequency of discussions about specific treatment preferences between patients and their proxies.

References (28)

  • Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. Public Law No. 101–508 Paragraph 4206,...
  • SM Wolf et al.

    Sources of concern about the patient self-determination act

    N Engl J Med

    (1991)
  • J LaPuma et al.

    Advance directives on admission: clinical implications and analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • ML White et al.

    The Patient Self-Determination act: on balance, more help than hindrance

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • PJ Greco et al.

    The Patient Self-Determination Act and the future of advance directives

    Ann Intern Med

    (1991)
  • A Capron

    The Patient Self-Determination Act: not now

    Hastings Cent Rep

    (1990)
  • LL Emanuel et al.

    Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use

    N Engl J Med

    (1991)
  • RH Shmerling et al.

    Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a study of elderly outpatients

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1988)
  • TE Finucane et al.

    Planning with elderly outpatients for contingencies of severe illness: a survey and clinical trial

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1988)
  • JH Zar

    Biostatistical analysis

  • M Hollander et al.

    Nonparametric statistical methods

    (1973)
  • DW Hosmer et al.

    Applied logistic regression

    (1989)
  • CK Cassel et al.

    Attitudes regarding life-extending medical care among the elderly and their children

    Gerontologist

    (1987)
  • Cited by (110)

    • Barriers to the Implementation of Palliative Care in the Nursing Home

      2007, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      Few people complete and use advance directives because of these barriers. The prevalence of written advance directive use nationwide is approximately 25% and, surprisingly, failed to significantly increase after the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act 1997.10–13 Seymour et al14 found that it may be preferable to emphasize advance care planning as a process of discussion and review between patients and their families and physicians over time instead of a once-and-for-all decision.

    • Advance Care Planning in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

      2007, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), which enrolled patients with a median predicted life expectancy of 6 months, 20%–24% of patients had advance directives at the time of the index hospitalization [19]. The prevalence of advance directives varies across studies, although most demonstrate completion rates comparable to or lower than those observed in SUPPORT [16,18,20-29]. Several studies suggest that the prevalence of advance directives may be higher in patients with cancer than in other groups [20,24,30,31].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research was supported in part by the DeCamp Foundation.

    1

    Ezekiel Emanuel is a recipient of an American Cancer Society Career Development Award

    2

    Linda Emanuel is a recipient of an American College of Physicians Teaching and Research Scholarship.

    View full text