Abstract
Risk communication poses a challenge to ordinary norms of truth-telling because it can easily mislead. Analyzing this challenge in terms of a systematic divergence between expertise and public attitudes fails to recognize how two specific features of the concept of risk play a role in managing daily affairs. First, evaluating risk always incorporates an estimate of the reliability of information. Since risk communication is an effort at providing information, audiences will naturally and appropriately incorporate their assessment of the reliability of the risk communicator into their assessment of the risk as such. Second, one conceptual and grammatical feature of the concept of risk is to categorize experience as non-routine and demanding further deliberation. That is, the whole point of calling something a risk can be to distinguish it from activities or phenomena that need no further attention. Risk communications that stress relative comparisons of measured probabilities and expected utilities can be inconsistent with both features of our concept of risk. At best they mislead; at worst they undermine our society’s capacity to cope with risk. While there are no simple answers to these two conundrums, technical experts should bear them in mind when communicating with the broader public.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Slovie, P. (1987) Perception of Risk, Science 236: 280–85.
Sandman, P. (1985) Getting to Maybe: Some Communications Aspects of Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities, Seton Hall Legislative Journal 9: 442–465.
Wilson, R. (1979) Analyzing the Daily Risks of Life, Technology Review 81(4):41–46.
Hornig, S. (1990) Science Stories: Risk, Power and Perceived Emphasis, Journalism Quarterly 67(4):767–777.
Starr, C., Rudman R. & Whipple, C. (1976) The Philosophical Foundations of Risk Assessment, Annual Review of Energy 1: 629–662.
Plough, A. and Krimsky S. (1987) The Emergence of Risk Communication Studies: Social and Political Context, Science, Technology and Human Values 12(3&4): 4–10.
Raynor, S. (1987) Risk and Relativism in Science for Policy, in: Johnson, B. B. and Covello, V. T., eds., The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 5–23.
Jasonoff, S. (1993) Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis 13:123–129.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications, London.
Wynne, B. (1992) Risk and Social Learning: Reification to Engagement, in: Krimsky, S. and Golding D., eds., Social Theories of Risk, Praeger Publishers, Wesport, CT., pp. 275–297.
Raynor, S. (1992) Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis, in: Krimsky, S. and Golding D., eds., Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 83–116.
Douglas, M. and Wildovsky A. (1984) Risk and Culture, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA..
Nagel, T. (1998) The Last Word, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Roty, R. (1994) Does Academic Freedom Have Philosophical Presuppositions? Academe 80:36–37.
Hornig, S. (1993) Reading Risk: Public Response to Print Media Accounts of Risk, Public Understanding of Science 2: 95–109.
Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991) Risk and Rationality. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Dewey, J. 1911 [republished 1993] The Problem of Truth, in: The Political Writings, Hackett Publishing Co, Indianapolis, IN,.
Williams, B. (1998) The End of Explanation, New York Review of Books 45(18, November): 40–44.
Thompson, P. B. & Dean, W. (1996) Competing Conceptions of Risk, Risk: Health, Safety and Environment 7:361–384.
Ziman, J. (1992) Not Knowing, Needing to Know and Wanting to Know,” in: Lewenstein, B.V., ed., When Science Meets the Public, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington D.C., pp 13–20.
Margolis, H. (1996) Dealing With Risk: Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lewis, H.W. (1990) Technological Risk, Norton, New York.
Thompson, P. B. (1997) Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective, Blackie Academic and Professional for Chapman and Hall, London.
Mayo, D.G. (1991) Sociological Versus Metascientific Views of Risk Assessment,” in: Mayo, D.G. & Hollander, R.D., eds. Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 249–279.
Covello, V., Sandman, P. & Slovic, P. (1991) Guidelines for Communicating Information About Chemical Risks Effectively and Responsibly, in: Mayo, D.G. & Hollander, R.D., eds. Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York: pp 66–90.
Thompson, P. B. (1995) Risk and Responsibilities in Modern Agriculture, in: Mepham, T. B., Tucker, G.A. & Wiseman, J. eds., Issues in Agricultural Bioethics, Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp. 31–45.
Ratzen, S.C. ed. (1998) The Mad Cow Crisis: Health and the Public Good. New York University Press, New York.
Harpold, T. L., Levy, M.L. & Savage, B.D. (1998) Transmissibility of BSE Across Species,” in: Ratzan, S. C., Ed., The Mad Cow Crisis: Health and the Public Good, New York University Press, New York, pp. 15–25.
Jasanoff, S. (1995) Product, process or programme: three cultures and the regulation of biotechnology, in: Bauer, M., ed., Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 311–331.
Jasanoff, S. (1997) Civilization and Madness: The Great BSE Scare of 1996, Public Understanding of Science 6:221–232.
Anand, P. (1998) Chronic Uncertainty and BSE Communications: Lessons from (and Limits of) Decision Theory, in: Ratzan, S.C., ed., The Mad Cow Crisis: Health and the Public Good, New York University Press, New York, pp. 51–62.
Powell, D. and Leiss, W. (1997) Mad Cows and Mothers Milk: The Perils of Poor Risk Communication. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal & Kingston.
Habermas, J. (1990) Discourse Ethies: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification, in: Benhabib, S. and Dallmayr, F., eds., The Communicative Ethics Debate, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, P.B. The ethics of truth-telling and the problem of risk. SCI ENG ETHICS 5, 489–510 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0050-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-999-0050-5