Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Human Rights, Dual Loyalties, and Clinical Independence

Challenges Facing Mental Health Professionals Working in Australia’s Immigration Detention Network

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although Australia has comparatively few individuals seeking asylum, it has had a mandatory detention policy in place since 1992. This policy has been maintained by successive governments despite the overwhelmingly negative impact mandatory detention has on mental health. For mental health professionals working in this environment, a number of moral, ethical, and human rights issues are raised. These issues are discussed here, with a focus on dual loyalty conflicts and drawing on personal experience, the bioethics and human rights literature, and recent parliamentary inquiries. For those who continue to work in this environment, future directions are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Essex.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Essex, R. Human Rights, Dual Loyalties, and Clinical Independence. Bioethical Inquiry 11, 75–83 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9493-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9493-0

Keywords

Navigation