Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: a European survey

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous European surveys showed the support of healthcare professionals for treatment withdrawal [i.e., artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) in chronic vegetative state (VS) patients]. The recent definition of minimally conscious state (MCS), and possibly research advances (e.g., functional neuroimaging), may have lead to uncertainty regarding potential residual perception and may have influenced opinions of healthcare professionals. The aim of the study was to update the end-of-life attitudes towards VS and to determine the end-of-life attitudes towards MCS. A 16-item questionnaire related to consciousness, pain and end-of-life issues in chronic (i.e., >1 year) VS and MCS and locked-in syndrome was distributed among attendants of medical and scientific conferences around Europe (n = 59). During a lecture, the items were explained orally to the attendants who needed to provide written yes/no responses. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses identified differences and associations for age, European region, religiosity, profession, and gender. We here report data on items concerning end-of-life issues on chronic VS and MCS. Responses were collected from 2,475 participants. For chronic VS (>1 year), 66% of healthcare professionals agreed to withdraw treatment and 82% wished not to be kept alive (P < 0.001). For chronic MCS (>1 year), less attendants agreed to withdraw treatment (28%, P < 0.001) and wished not to be kept alive (67%, P < 0.001). MCS was considered worse than VS for the patients in 54% and for their families in 42% of the sample. Respondents’ opinions were associated with geographic region and religiosity. Our data show that end-of-life opinions differ for VS as compared to MCS. The introduction of the diagnostic criteria for MCS has not substantially changed the opinions on end-of-life issues on permanent VS. Additionally, the existing legal ambiguity around MCS may have influenced the audience to draw a line between expressing preferences for self versus others, by implicitly recognizing that the latter could be a step on the slippery slope to legalize euthanasia. Given the observed individual variability, we stress the importance of advance directives and identification of proxies when discussing end-of-life issues in patients with disorders of consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Posner J, Saper C, Schiff N, Plum F (eds) (2007) Plum and posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jennett B, Plum F (1972) Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1:734–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58:349–353

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1995) Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laureys S, Pellas F, Van Eeckhout P, Ghorbel S, Schnakers C, Perrin F, Berre J, Faymonville ME, Pantke KH, Damas F, Lamy M, Moonen G, Goldman S (2005) The locked-in syndrome : what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res 150:495–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leon-Carrion J, van Eeckhout P, Dominguez-Morales Mdel R, Perez-Santamaria FJ (2002) The locked-in syndrome: a syndrome looking for a therapy. Brain Inj 16:571–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jennett B (2002) Attitudes to the permanent vegetative state. In: Jennett B (ed) The vegetative state. Medical facts, ethical and legal dilemmas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Demertzi A, Liew C, Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Sharpe M, Laureys S, Zeman A (2009) Dualism persists in the science of mind. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1157:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Demertzi A, Schnakers C, Ledoux D, Chatelle C, Bruno MA, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Boly M, Moonen G, Laureys S (2009) Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals. Prog Brain Res 177:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woodcock T (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the ethicus study. JAMA 290:790–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Laureys S, Celesia GG, Cohadon F, Lavrijsen J, Leon-Carrrion J, Sannita WG, Sazbon L, Schmutzhard E, von Wild KR, Zeman A, Dolce G, Disorders Of Consciousness TE (2010) Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a new name for the vegetative state or apallic syndrome. BMC Med 8:68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino JT, Ventura M, Boly M, Majerus S, Moonen G, Laureys S (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC neurol 9:35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD (2006) Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science (New York, NY) 313:1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, Boly M, Pickard JD, Tshibanda L, Owen AM, Laureys S (2010) Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 362:579–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Di HB, Yu SM, Weng XC, Laureys S, Yu D, Li JQ, Qin PM, Zhu YH, Zhang SZ, Chen YZ (2007) Cerebral response to patient’s own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology 68:895–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grubb A, Walsh P, Lambe N, Murrells T, Robinson S (1997) The moral and legal issues surrounding the treatment and care of patients in persistent vegetative state. Report to European Biomedical and Health Research Programme

  17. Burke WJ (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 59(1473):1473–1474 author reply

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ledoux D, Bruno MA, Schnakers C, Giacino JT, Ventura M, Vanopdenbosch L, Peeters E, Lannoo E, Willemart T, Laureys S (2008) Outcome of vegetative and minimally conscious states: results from the belgian federal expertise network. In: Eighteenth meeting of the European Neurological Society, Nice, France, p 24 7–11 June 2008

  19. The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994) Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (2). N Engl J Med 330:1572–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Voss HU, Uluc AM, Dyke JP, Watts R, Kobylarz EJ, McCandliss BD, Heier LA, Beattie BJ, Hamacher KA, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, Ballon D, Giacino JT, Schiff ND (2006) Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. J Clin Invest 116:2005–2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boly M, Faymonville ME, Schnakers C, Peigneux P, Lambermont B, Phillips C, Lancellotti P, Luxen A, Lamy M, Moonen G, Maquet P, Laureys S (2008) Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with pet activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 7:1013–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gillick MR, Hesse K, Mazzapica N (1993) Medical technology at the end of life. What would physicians and nurses want for themselves? [published erratum appears in arch intern med 1994 feb 28;154(4):468]. Arch Intern Med 153:2542–2547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosner F (1993) Why nutrition and hydration should not be withheld from patients. Chest 104:1892–1896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jennett B (2002) Ethical issues. In: Jennett B (ed) The vegetative state. Medical facts, ethical and legal dilemmas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 97–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Boveroux P, Kirsch M, Boly M, Massion P, Sadzot B, Lambermont B, Lancellotti P, Piret S, Damas P, Damas F, Moonen G, Laureys S, Ledoux D (2008) Neurologic prognosis assessment in postanoxic encephalopathy. Reanimation 17:613–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laureys S, Giacino JT, Schiff ND, Schabus M, Owen AM (2006) How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs? Curr Opin Neurol 19:520–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jennett B (1976) Editorial: Resource allocation for the severely brain damaged. Arch Neurol 33:595–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brett AS (1991) Limitations of listing specific medical interventions in advance directives. JAMA 266:825–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee MA, Smith DM, Fenn DS, Ganzini L (1998) Do patients’ treatment decisions match advance statements of their preferences? J Clin Ethics 9:258–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gready RM, Ditto PH, Danks JH, Coppola KM, Lockhart LK, Smucker WD (2000) Actual and perceived stability of preferences for life-sustaining treatment. J Clin Ethics 11:334–346

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Christakis NA, Asch DA (1995) Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support. Am J Public Health 85:367–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vincent JL (1999) Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med 27:1626–1633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yaguchi A, Truog RD, Curtis JR, Luce JM, Levy MM, Melot C, Vincent JL (2005) International differences in end-of-life attitudes in the intensive care unit: results of a survey. Arch Intern Med 165:1970–1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stern JM, Sazbon L, Becker E, Costeff H (1988) Severe behavioural disturbance in families of patients with prolonged coma. Brain Inj 2:259–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chiambretto P, Rossi Ferrario S, Zotti AM (2001) Patients in a persistent vegetative state: caregiver attitudes and reactions. Acta Neurol Scand 104:364–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobs HE, Muir CA, Cline JD (1986) Family reactions to persistent vegetative state. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grubb A, Walsh P, Lambe N, Murrells T, Robinson S (1996) Survey of british clinicians’ views on management of patients in persistent vegetative state. Lancet 348:35–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kahane G, Savulescu J (2009) Brain damage and the moral significance of consciousness. J Med Philos 34:6–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wilkinson DJ, Kahane G, Horne M, Savulescu J (2009) Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from vegetative patients. J Med Ethics 35:508–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Silveira MJ, Kim SY, Langa KM (2010) Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med 362:1211–1218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernat E (1999) The living will: does an advance refusal of treatment made with capacity always survive any supervening incapacity? Med Law Int 4:1–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pollard C, Kennedy P (2007) A longitudinal analysis of emotional impact, coping strategies and post-traumatic psychological growth following spinal cord injury: a 10-year review. Br J Health Psychol 12:347–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lule D, Zickler C, Hacker S, Bruno MA, Demertzi A, Pellas F, Laureys S, Kubler A (2009) Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Prog Brain Res 177:339–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bernat JL (2002) The persistent vegetative state and related states. Ethical issues in neurology, 2nd edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, pp 283–305

    Google Scholar 

  45. Royal College of Physicians (2003) The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med 3:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shevell M (2004) Ethical issues in pediatric critical care neurology. Semin Pediatr Neurol 11:179–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson LS (2010) The right to die in the minimally conscious state. J Med Ethics

  48. Fins JJ (2006) Affirming the right to care, preserving the right to die: disorders of consciousness and neuroethics after schiavo. Palliat Support Care 4:169–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dierickx K, Schotsmans P, Grubb A, Walsh P, Lambe N (1998) Belgian doctors’ attitudes on the management of patients in persistent vegetative state (pvs): ethical and regulatory aspects. Acta Neurochir 140:481–489

    Google Scholar 

  50. Payne K, Taylor RM, Stocking C, Sachs GA (1996) Physicians’ attitudes about the care of patients in the persistent vegetative state: a national survey. Ann Intern Med 125:104–110

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hodges MO, Tolle SW, Stocking C, Cassel CK (1994) Tube feeding. Internists’ attitudes regarding ethical obligations. Arch Intern Med 154:1013–1020

    Google Scholar 

  52. Brunetti LL, Carperos SD, Westlund RE (1991) Physicians’ attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. J Gen Intern Med 6:323–329

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank J. Savulescu, D.J. Wilkinson and N. Levy from the Wellcome Centre for Neuroethics, University of Oxford, UK, for the valuable contribution to the discussion on bioethical issues in treatment limitation from patients with disorders of consciousness. This research was funded by the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FNRS), the European Commission (DISCOS, Marie-Curie Actions), the James McDonnell Foundation, the Mind Science Foundation, the French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action (ARC-06/11-340), the Fondation Médicale Reine Elisabeth and the University of Liège.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Laureys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demertzi, A., Ledoux, D., Bruno, MA. et al. Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: a European survey. J Neurol 258, 1058–1065 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5882-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5882-z

Keywords

Navigation