Skip to main content
Log in

Why healthy subjects volunteer for phase I studies and how they perceive their participation?

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the motivations and attitudes of healthy subjects who volunteer for phase I studies as well as their perception of the informed consent procedure and participation in the study.

Methods

Subjects (n = 136, 48.5/51.5% males/females, 26.9 ± 5.5 years; 51.9% students, 42.2% employed, 5.9% unemployed) anonymously answered questionnaires regarding study participation and personality (Revised NEO Personality Inventory).

Results

Financial reward was the most important motivation and was most valued by subjects with a lower monthly income (p < 0.01) and lower education (p < 0.05). Personality traits correlated differently with the various motivators for participation. “Word-of-mouth” (mainly by ex-participants) was the source of information on the phase I study for 94.9% of the participants. Most (88.2%) subjects consulted other people (family member/partner, 53.3% of participants; friends, 40.0%; physician, 25.0%) before deciding to participate. In 80% of the cases, the people consulted recommended that the subject not participate, with the risk of serious complications being the main objection in 75.7% cases. The information provided was generally assessed favorably; 34.6% of subjects considered the discomfort caused by participation to be less than that originally reported during the consent procedure, 58.8% considered it to be identical and 6.6% considered it to be higher. Most of the subjects (81.6%) declared that they never felt at risk of a serious complication during their participation in the study, 16.2% occasionally felt that they were at risk and 2.2% felt that they were at risk for a significant period of time. Personality traits correlated with the decision to ask someone else’s opinion, the manner in which information provided was rated and the perception of the risk taken during participation.

Conclusion

Financial reward as the main motivator for participation in phase I studies was less valued by healthy volunteers with a higher income and education. A subject’s motivations and perceptions toward participation were found to be influenced by individual characteristics, including some personality traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tishler CL, Bartholomae S (2002) The recruitment of normal healthy volunteers: a review of the literature on the use of financial incentives. J Clin Pharmacol 42:365–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bigorra J, Baños JE (1990) Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 38:443–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Esecover H, Malitz S, Wilkens B (1961) Clinical profiles of paid normal subjects volunteering for hallucinogen drug studies. Am J Psychiatry 117:910–915

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hassar M, Pocelinko R, Weintraub M, Nelson D, Thomas G, Lasagna L (1977) Free-living volunteer’s motivations and attitudes toward pharmacologic studies in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 21:515–519

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin DC, Arnold JD, Zimmerman TF, Richart RH (1968) Human subjects in clinical research: a report of three studies. N Engl J Med 279:1426–1431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Novak E, Seckman CE, Stewart RD (1977) Motivations for volunteering as research subjects. J Clin Pharmacol 365–371

  7. Van Gelderen CEM, Savelkoul TJF, Van Dokkum W, Meulenbelt J (1993) Motives and perception of healthy volunteers who participate in experiments. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 45:15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vrlovac R, Francetic I, Rotim K (1990) Drug trials on healthy volunteers in Yugoslavia. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 28:375–379

    Google Scholar 

  9. Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL

  10. Digman JM (1990) Emergence of the five factor. Annu Rev Psychol 41:417–440

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative “Description of Personality”: the big-five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol 59:1216–1229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pedroso-de-Lima M, Simões A (2000) NEO PI-R: Inventário de Personalidade NEO Revisto. Manual profissional. CEGOC–TEA, Ltd, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rocha D (2000) NEO PI-R: CEGOC system, software para cotação informatizada do teste NEO-PI-R. CEGOC-TEA, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson JA, Weijer C (2001) The research subject as entrepeneur. Am J Bioethics 1:67–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayd FJ, Calabresi P (1972) Motivations and rewards for volunteering to be an experimental subject. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:771–781

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dickert N, Grady C (1999) What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med 341:198–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Erb K, Staks T, Su C-A (1994) Trends in the remuneration of volunteers. Appl Clin Trials 3:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gribbin K, Schaie KW (1976) Monetary incentive, age, and cognition. Exp Aging Res 2:461–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyun I (2006) Fair payment or undue inducement? Nature 442:629–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McGee C (1997) A piece of my mind: subject to payment? JAMA 278:199–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Russel ML, Moralejo DG, Burgess ED (2000) Paying research subjects: participant’s perspectives. J Med Ethics 26:126–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tishler CL, Bartholomae S (2003) Repeat participation among normal healthy research volunteers: professional guinea pigs in clinical trials? Perspect Biol Med 46:508–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vere DW (1991) Payments to healthy volunteers: ethical problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol 32:141–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Viens AM (2001) Socio-economic status and inducement to participate. Am J Bioethics 1:69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weijer C (1999) What’s the price of a research subject? N Engl J Med 341:206

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zink S (2001) Maybe we should pay them more. Am J Bioethics 1:88–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Almeida L, Azevedo B, Nunes T, Vaz-da-Silva M, Albino-Teixeira A, Falcao A, Coelho R, Soares-da-Silva P (2006) Healthy subjects’ motivations to volunteer for participation in human pharmacology studies (Abstr 1071). J Clin Pharmacol 46:1077

    Google Scholar 

  28. Newton L (1982) Inducement, due and otherwise. IRB 4:4–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rabin C, Tabak N (2006) Healthy participants in phase I clinical trials: the quality of their decision to take part. J Clin Nurs 15:971–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our deep gratitude to the volunteers for agreeing to participate, and to Grazina Binkauskiene, PhD, and Vitalija Avdejenkova, PhD, for their assistance in the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Almeida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almeida, L., Azevedo, B., Nunes, T. et al. Why healthy subjects volunteer for phase I studies and how they perceive their participation?. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 63, 1085–1094 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0368-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0368-3

Keywords

Navigation