Skip to main content
Log in

Definition and classification of cancer: Monothetic or polythetic?

  • Special Articles
  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the microbiological revolution, most infectious diseases have been defined and classified according to an etiologic criterion, i.e. the identification of single, external “necessary” causes (for example, Mycobacterium for tuberculosis). This is not the case with cancer. Not only external “necessary” causes of cancer have not been identified, but also the morphological classification cannot be based on univocal criteria. Although “neoplasia” and “anaplasia” appear to be universal attributes of cancer, these events are only quantitative. Neoplastic growth can be fast or slow (development may take weeks or years), and tissue pathologies are difficult to detect from normal tissue in some cancers but are obvious in others. Common special properties of anaplasia appear to be concealed in the wide range of morphologies. In the absence of a coherent morphological definition, and of external necessary causes (such as bacteria for infectious diseases), a mechanistic definition could be adopted. However, unless molecular biology discovers specific mechanistic steps in carcinogenesis, which indicate the existence of “necessary” events in carcinogenesis, we cannot adopt a univocal (monothetic) definition of cancer. The alternative is to use a polythetic definition, according to Wittgenstein's model of a “long rope twisted together out of many shorter fibres.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacMahon B, Pugh TF,Epidemiology — Principles and Methods. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuhn TS.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker GP, and Hacker PMS.Wittgenstein — Meaning and Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980:185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization.International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Geneva: WHO, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berg JW. Morphologic classification of human cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds.Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1982:74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pardee AB. Principles of cancer biology: biochemistry and cell biology. In: De Vita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds.Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology, 2nd Edition. New York: Lippincott, 1985:3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muller J.On the Nature and Structural Characteristics of Cancer. London: Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper, 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson MW, Maronpot RR, Reynolds SH. Role of oncogenes in chemical carcinogenesis: extrapolation from rodents to humans. In: Bartsch H, Hemminki K, O'Neill IK, eds.Methods for Detecting DNA Damaging Agents in Humans. IARC Scie. Publ. No. 89, Lyon: IARC, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vahakangas KH, Samet JM, Metcalf RA, Welsh JA, Bennett JP, Lane DP, Harris CC. Mutations of p53 and ras genes in radon-associated lung cancer from uranium miners.Lancet 1992;339:576–580.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sporn MB. Carcinogenesis and cancer: different perspectives on the same disease.Cancer Res. 1991;51:6215–6218.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SH, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectaltumor development.N. Engl. J. Med. 1988;319:525–532.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vineis, P. Definition and classification of cancer: Monothetic or polythetic?. Theor Med Bioeth 14, 249–256 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995166

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995166

Key words

Navigation