Abstract
Empirical research can aid ethical reflection in bioethics by identifying issues, by seeing how they are currently resolved, and by assessing the consequences of these current resolutions. This potential can be misused when the ethical issues in question are fundamentally non-consequentialist or when they are consequentialist but the empirical research fails to address the important consequences. An example of the former problem is some recent studies about bad consequences resulting from commercialized living kidney donor programs. These consequences could be avoided, but the crucial non-consequentialist ethical issues about exploitation and commercialization would still remain. Examples of the latter problem are provided by recent studies of the allocation of ICU beds and of physician deception, where important consequences were not adequately studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brody BA. Quality of scholarship in bioethics.Journal of Med and Phil 1990;15:161–178.
Council of the Transplantation Society. Commercialization in transplantation.Lancet 1985;ii:715.
Salahudeen AK et al. High mortality among recipients of bought living unrelated donor kidneys.Lancet 1990;ii:725–728.
Al-Khader AA. Living non-related kidney transplantation in Bombay.Lancet 1990;ii:1002.
Strauss MJ et al. Rationing of intensive care unit services.JAMA 1986;225:1143–46.
Engelhardt HT and Rie MA. Intensive care units, scarce resources, and conflicting principles of justice.JAMA 1986;255:1159–64.
Bok S.Lying, New York, N.Y.: Vintage Books, 1978.
Novack DH et al. Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems.JAMA 1989;261:2980–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brody, B.A. Assessing empirical research in bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth 14, 211–219 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995163
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995163