Skip to main content
Log in

Political and interpersonal aspects of ethics consultation

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous papers on ethics consultation in medicine have taken a positivistic approach and lack critical scrutiny of the psychosocial, political, and moral contexts in which consultations occur. This paper discusses some of the contextual factors that require more careful research. We need to know more about what prompts and inhibits consultation, especially what factors effectively prevent house officers and nonphysicians from requesting consultation despite perceived moral conflict in cases. The attitudes and institutional power of attending medical staff seem important, especially where innovative interventions raise ethical questions. Ethics consultants also need to address the thorny problems of the origin(s) of the consultant's authority, whistleblowing, conflicts of interest that affect the consultant, persistently poor communications in hospitals, systemic inequity in the availability or quality of services for some, and the standing of the consultant's recommendations, including their appearance in the patient's medical record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grodin MA, Markley WS, McDonald AE. Use of an institutional ethics team on a pediatric service. QRB 1985;11:16–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. LaPuma J. Consultations in clinical ethics — issues and questions in 27 cases. West J Med 1987;146:633–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LaPuma J, Stocking CB, Silverstein MD, Dimartini A, Siegler M. An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital: utilization and evaluation. JAMA 1988;260:808–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perkins HS, Saathoff BS. Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians: an exploratory study. Am J Med 1988;85:761–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wear S, Katz P, Andrzejewski B, Haryadi T. The development of an ethics consultation service. HEC Forum 1990;2:75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  6. White M. Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Ethics Consultation Service at the University of Virginia Medical Center. Charlottesville, VA: Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Virginia, 1989 (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomasma DC. Legitimate and illegitimate roles for the medical ethicist. In: Ackerman TF, Graber GC, Reynolds CH, Thomasma DC, eds. Clinical Medical Ethics: Exploration and Assessment. Lanham, MA: University Press of America 1987:83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan P. Philosophers have no place at bedside, physician-lawyer maintains. Can Med Assoc J 1989;140:1194–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruddick W. Can doctors and philosophers work together? Hastings Cent Rep 1981;11(April):12–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Purtilo RB. A comment on the concept of consultation. In: Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siegler M. Ethics committees: decisions by bureaucracy. Hastings Cent Rep 1986;16(June):22–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LaPuma J, Toulmin SE. Ethics consultants and ethics committees. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:1109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Purtilo RB. Ethics consultations in the hospital. N Engl J Med 1984;311:983–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothenberg LS. Clinical ethicists and hospital ethics consultants: the nature of the “clinical” role. In: Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ackerman TF. Conceptualizing the role of the ethics consultant: some theoretical issues. In: Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siegler M, Singer PA. Clinical ethics consultation: Godsend or “God squad?” Amer J Med 1988;85:759–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siegler M. Cautionary advice for humanists. Hastings Cent Rep 1981;11(April):19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jonsen AR. Watching the doctor. N Engl J Med 1983;308:1531–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bosk C. The fieldworker as watcher and witness. Hastings Cent Rep 1985;15(June):10–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Agich GJ. Clinical ethics: a role theoretical look. Soc Sci Med 1990;30:389–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davis AJ. Ethics consultation with hospital employees in complex medical settings. In: Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:109–16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wassersug JD. Invasion of the ethicists. MD 1988;(April):28–34.

  23. Moore FD. The desperate case: CARE (costs, applicability, research, ethics). JAMA 1989;261:1483–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fox RC, Swazey JP. The clinical moratorium. In: Fox RC, ed. Essays in Medical Sociology: Journeys into the Field. 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1988:325–63.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson JA. Clinical medical ethics and the law: the rights and duties of ethics consultants. In: Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:157–72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fletcher JC. Ethics consultation services: an overview. Biolaw 1990;2(Special Sections):S339–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frader, J.E. Political and interpersonal aspects of ethics consultation. Theor Med Bioeth 13, 31–44 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489218

Key words

Navigation